染雾十二怒汉观后感英语 篇一
After watching "Twelve Angry Men," I was deeply moved by the power of critical thinking and the importance of standing up for what is right. The film tells the story of twelve jurors deliberating over the fate of a young man accused of murder. Initially, most of the jurors are convinced of the defendant's guilt, but as the deliberations progress, one juror's commitment to justice and his ability to critically analyze the evidence begin to sway the others.
One of the main themes that stood out to me in the film was the danger of making assumptions based on stereotypes and prejudices. Throughout the deliberations, it becomes clear that many of the jurors had already made up their minds about the defendant based on his background and appearance. However, as the evidence is examined more closely and biases are challenged, the jurors realize that they cannot let their preconceived notions cloud their judgment.
Another theme that resonated with me was the importance of speaking up and defending one's beliefs, even in the face of opposition. The protagonist juror, played by Henry Fonda, faces immense pressure and resistance from the other jurors who are eager to reach a quick guilty verdict. However, he remains steadfast in his belief in the defendant's innocence and refuses to be swayed by the majority. His courage and conviction ultimately lead to a just verdict and highlight the significance of standing up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
The film also highlights the power of critical thinking and the need to question assumptions and biases. As the jurors reexamine the evidence and discuss the testimony presented during the trial, they begin to uncover inconsistencies and gaps in the prosecution's case. This critical analysis allows them to see the flaws in the initial guilty verdict and reevaluate their positions. It serves as a reminder that critical thinking is crucial in ensuring a fair and just legal system.
Overall, "Twelve Angry Men" is a thought-provoking film that explores themes of prejudice, justice, and the power of critical thinking. It serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning assumptions, standing up for what is right, and not allowing prejudice to cloud judgment. The film left me with a renewed sense of the power of critical thinking and the responsibility we all have to ensure justice is served.
十二怒汉观后感英语 篇二
"Twelve Angry Men" is a gripping film that tackles important themes such as justice, prejudice, and the power of persuasion. Set entirely in a jury room, the film follows twelve jurors as they deliberate over the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of murdering his father. Through the intense discussions and personal conflicts that arise, the film highlights the complexities of the justice system and the impact of individual biases on the outcome of a trial.
One of the most compelling aspects of the film is the exploration of prejudice and its influence on decision-making. As the jurors begin their deliberations, it becomes evident that many of them have already made up their minds about the defendant's guilt based on their own biases and assumptions. These biases range from racial prejudice to personal experiences that shape their perceptions of the case. The film demonstrates the dangers of allowing prejudice to cloud judgment and reminds us of the importance of examining evidence objectively.
Another significant theme in the film is the power of persuasion and effective communication. Throughout the deliberations, the jurors engage in intense debates, presenting their arguments and attempting to convince others to change their initial positions. These discussions highlight the importance of clear and compelling communication in influencing others' opinions. It also emphasizes the significance of listening and being open to different perspectives, as the jurors gradually uncover new evidence and challenge each other's assumptions.
The film also raises questions about the fairness and flaws of the justice system. As the deliberations unfold, it becomes apparent that the defendant's fate rests in the hands of fallible individuals who are susceptible to personal biases and external pressures. The film suggests that the outcome of a trial can be influenced by factors beyond the evidence presented, such as personal prejudices and the dynamics within the jury room. This realization raises concerns about the objectivity and reliability of the justice system, leaving viewers pondering the limitations and room for improvement.
In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" is a thought-provoking film that delves into the complexities of the justice system and the impact of individual biases on the outcome of a trial. Through its exploration of themes such as prejudice, persuasion, and the flaws of the justice system, the film encourages viewers to reflect on the importance of critical thinking, open-mindedness, and fairness in the pursuit of justice. It serves as a reminder that the responsibility of ensuring a just society lies in the hands of individuals who are willing to challenge their own biases and advocate for the truth.
十二怒汉观后感英语 篇三
Russian version has a strong sense of subtlety.
I never love political overtones, did not think this movie was involved in a war of national social factors and so on, more than two hours of film has let me unable to stop procrastinating, do something else, watch more than 8 hours, it was very.
The story is a Chechen boy killed stepfather was brought to court, 12 jurors in a small room from only one person that he was innocent, the people put forward all kinds of evidence of doubt, finally everyone voted innocent boy. Almost everyone's background, ideas, opinions, etc..
I do not say this movie is good or not, anyway, for political white ethnic confrontation problem has always been an insulator. It is said that after the first vote, there was a man who was not guilty, because he thought he could not be so hasty to send the child to the guillotine, so he proposed to carry out second anonymous voting, a person has also been acquitted.
In this section I can not understand, though it should be the expressio
n of real name and anonymous can change a person's decisions, do not blindly follow the crowd, but after the voting, the people immediately stand out is their own investment, which will soon be exposed "defection", also really can. In particular, the argument is not to take the child's life away.
Heard that the black and white version 1957 better, so the next day is the turning point of view.
From the rhythm, indeed very good grasp. Pinch out all kinds of unnecessary plot, is completely 12 people for each child to put forward their own justifications.
Everything is at the center: if the child is likely to be innocent, he should not be convicted of the crime.
The United States Justice, I have seen in the description of Linda to be truly understand, this movie is very perfect to show the American judicial philosophy: I would rather let one thousand, not kill the wrong one.
In this story, every juror has no name, did not find out who is the real murderer, (because the Russian version of the real estate business, demolitions) discrimination the boy's identity is a slum origin, rather than racial conflicts......
Until the last we walked out of the court, there are only two of the most important to insist on the innocent boy reported the name of each other, no phone, no address, there will be no intersection. From the people, back to the people.
Space seems to be better.
十二怒汉观后感英语 篇四
Read the drama "12 people", and came back to review the United States under the old film of the year twelve, "the anger of the 57 Han".
The story is very simple, a child, the film is colored, the drama did not appear, was accused of murdering his father. The family lived in the slums, in the eyes of some people from generation to generation are criminals and bad ass villain, natural. And all the evidence points to the child as the murderer. The draw for the 12 jurors, all staff have what occupation, 11 people think children guilty, only Henry Fonda architects think of doubt, although he is not very sure. As a result, an increasing number of jurors saw the suspect in the case and voted to pass.
The result is not important, the process can glimpse the essence of Democracy: defend everyone's right to freedom of speech (Note: should be everybody's birthright, rather than the gifts of others, power) this person is either young or old, poor or rich, or who is ru. Democracy is the freedom to give everyone the full expression of their views. Of course, from this story can also be seen, small people, muddle along without any aim of moral justice or a sense of super guard unknown to the ordinary people are likely to be the representation of fudge, may also be in the democratic system under control. So, I agree, in the overall quality of the public is not high, the democracy is likely to fail, because many people vote not worth several Steamed Buns, or a lot of people do not know what is the election of a large number of inpidual shares, so after the collapse of the Soviet Union to the public ownership of private ownership by capitalists acquisition the situation may also occur in the family who have an ulterior motive power.
After the liberation of China, there have been grassroots democracy experiment, which is Liu Shaoji pushed, but because of the resistance of the hair, did not push down. Now the community election, there are a lot of people say it is a formality, but from a positive point of view, this is not a democratic education, at least let everyone know how is the process of election. After a few years of your community appeared in a car with the big horn canvassing, do propaganda scenes, is very likely. At this time, democracy really into the lives of ordinary people, that is, democratic life. I met several people, without exception, and they talk of democracy in Taiwan, elected, they are not interested in, it is said that the Taiwan few young people are interested in politics; but in the mainland, in the premise of not achieve universal suffrage, politics seems to often is a topic of gossip for you talk about the. This is not because, people naturally than Taiwanese people interested in politics, just like to put you in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, you think too little oxygen, need oxygen, but in the plain here, you will not care about what the air is. This is a scarce resource in economics. After the democratic life, everyone has become commonplace, It is quite common for a part of life, so everyone's interest naturally low, rather than talk about the star's private life is stimulated.
Look at the handling of drama and movies, including the plot lines are exactly the same, but in the scene of the atmosphere, it reflects the different understanding of democracy under the two kinds of social systems. The drama is full of black background, spacious and solemn, express a kind of democracy and the pine worship, understanding of democracy from the mouth of a jury in the mouth, with the obvious meaning of religion. The scene is a small room with a narrow, is a sultry fidgety summer afternoon, twelve men crowded in a small space, discuss a majority of people think a foregone conclusion, nature is not love. And one of the twelve fans, boss, advertisers are logical to have these occupation identity of a life of the background. Their tone of voice is also relatively soft and casual, although there are arguments, confrontation, but to give the feeling that this is a real life scene, their argument is part of their lives. On the stage of the jury is clearly an ideal space, let the audience start to think, in such a solemn place, the nature is a heavy topic, 12 people take is also sacred and arduous responsibility. This is a religious scene. I do not deny the 12 jurors responsibility is sacred and arduous, but in a democratic society, this responsibility has been a part of their lives, without the need for a special ceremony to worship.
I think I should make it clear that the issue of democratic life, the next time to discuss the issue of democratization of life.
