染雾十二怒汉观后感英文篇一
After watching "12 Angry Men," I couldn't help but be captivated by the intense and thought-provoking story that unfolded on the screen. The film, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place entirely in a jury room and explores the complexities of the justice system and human nature.
One of the aspects that struck me the most about the film was its portrayal of the power of persuasion and the influence of personal biases. As the twelve jurors deliberate on the fate of a young man accused of murder, it becomes evident that their initial guilty verdict is based on assumptions and preconceived notions rather than concrete evidence. However, as the film progresses, one juror, played by Henry Fonda, begins to question the reliability of the evidence and slowly convinces the other jurors to reevaluate their positions.
The film effectively highlights the importance of critical thinking and the dangers of groupthink. It showcases how individuals can be swayed by the dominant opinions in a group, even if those opinions are not based on facts or logic. Through the character of Juror Number 8, we see the power of standing up for what is right, even when it goes against the popular consensus. This aspect of the film reminded me of the importance of independent thinking and the need to question authority.
Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" also explores the theme of justice and the flaws within the legal system. The film portrays the flaws of the justice system by highlighting the prejudices and personal biases of the jurors. It serves as a reminder that justice is not always served, and that the outcome of a trial can be heavily influenced by personal beliefs and societal pressures.
The performances in "12 Angry Men" were exceptional, with each actor bringing depth and complexity to their respective characters. The tension and conflict within the jury room were palpable, and I found myself completely engrossed in the emotional journey of each juror.
In conclusion, "12 Angry Men" is a thought-provoking and powerful film that explores the complexities of the justice system and human nature. It serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and independent thought, and the dangers of groupthink and personal biases. The performances are outstanding, and the film leaves a lasting impact on its viewers.
十二怒汉观后感英文 篇三
But think about it, or only gave three stars.
Why?
Because the movie is not pure. It is the theme of too much, the amount of information you want to convey is too large, although not so difficult to understand and accept, but the actual shot out of the situation is much more confusing: the jury system questioned the original Lumet preserved, influence to the Russian Chechen War menta
lity is he stressed, then through to Russia's dissatisfaction with the status quo of the beginning ("streets are Mercedes BMW Audi, only three minutes walk to the theatre of the road eight"), the narrative part involved everyone when mixed with too much of everyone's personal feelings, almost everyone said a case may not have with their the relationship between the piece, and then to the case itself (because of a surge in interest related to ethnic issues ah) increased the number of suspense drama elements, and finally to a strange man fancy...... Wang Yi think that this version than the conception of Lumet high, oh, maybe, but was not everything, although Kharkov has never let his film meters out of control, but still seem messy, and the strength is a scattered, feeling no matter which themes are focused on not just skimming over the surface like this in the past. No matter - I hate conception conception is not in the way of literature to discuss the film, the film quality, whether it is the rhythm, focus, or narrative control, this is a lot less than the old version.
Then talk about technology. Whether new or old version, is a technology very good film, but the difference is that the old version of the technology, with the integration of narrative is very good, whether it is the opening track length mirror beautiful, or to enter the space after the precise positioning, had a sudden feeling, and the new version, most of the time, let the people think it is a virtuoso technique -- try a decorative. For example, 4 ed in dog holding hands through the lens, in a sense, can reduce at least once, always repeat, even the flashing lights of suspense, to finally will make people feel flat and uninteresting.
Watch this movie shows a sense, not the seafood cooked together, called sea food and poultry, or a hodgepodge.
By the way of Mikhalkov, the Slavophilism heavy director, is now famous Russian director in one of the largest, but I am not very love, because that kind of Slavic tastes! Sometimes, in order to render this complex, he is willing to destroy the whole structure of the film (Siberia barber), so that the mood itself has become an independent part of the film. When it comes to artistic conception, with the same Slavic complex than Sokolov, far worse.
十二怒汉观后感英文 篇四
I don't know when to start, when upset or depressed, I used to find old movies, especially in black and white, from which get quiet and elegant is important to me. When the movie is the movie, every word, every shot, a seamless heavenly robe.
If not a summer night, in front of the 12 inch TV "murder in the Orient Express", I am afraid I will not engage in the occupation, so Sidney Lumet on my film concept that enlightenment can be formed. Not only is my occupation, Lumet outlook on life enlightenment, than the so-called supernatural forces of evil, I fear more complex. So far, I do not dare to read the murder of the Orient Express, the original, even if I have read most of Agatha's works, for fear that the text will destroy my heart on the film version of the feelings.
"Twelve Angry Men" is a kind of courage to cash, Henry Fonda against eleven companions of courage, personal subjective experience and attitude against the truth of courage, fairness and justice against self courage, American judicial system and social harmony of confrontation, and of course Lv Mei will have the courage.
If I in twelve, I will think what what language, I am afraid that I am going with Ning Wang Zong not paranoid, or just because the bad boy will affect the society and others, so he will be charged to preach. This is not only my own narrow, I believe this is the so-called "good man" narrow.
He is good at a single space, refining and performance in depth at mining and play on the event. "Twelve Angry Men", "summer afternoon", "Murder on the Orient Express" is a single main space, single and multi scene, closed interior, rich images may have been the maximum limit, but these films are undoubtedly good. Hitchcock was regarded as a master, he is often neglected, comparison of production, the style is fixed, is probably Lumet's limitations, but I still Lumet grievance. Who bought a home on film creation works in the United States, it is a pity that English, lazy I still will put on the shelf.
I love those who do not show off the lens of the director, even if I teach audio-visual, but do not think that audio-visual should be placed above the film, the film is still moving me those characters and stories. So I love Billy Wilde, I love Sidney lumet. Most of the enclosed space is the scene of studio Lumet's studio, but he always prefers to use even short focus wide-angle lens, especially the "Orient Express", if not considering the light, three foot position and space depth background that really makes people think a real. So is the "Twelve Angry Men", using live scene very well, but he is not very restrained, the excessive use of "impossible shots", get consensus only at the end of twelve jurors picked up one by one, hung in the closet coat slowly out of the lens with dressing cabinet a few suits the prospect of jury they are leaving, finally leaving Henry Fonda picked up is still lying in the last like a stubborn choked the suit on the table, put him on, this is the understanding and support between men.
He was restrained, even if the opening second is through the lens space and the atmosphere design of long lens typical account court, until out of the case is still the core of the film court. But as the opening is very suitable for the era, which has no feelings of infatuation to mirror director long, compared with Ocean Wells's "touch of evil", this scene actually has been quite restrained.
He was restrained, he did not because the single space added in the trial court, witnesses the flashback or reproduce the scene. For most of the directors, such a structure is always inevitable, even though I, although we all understand the interest and charm of a single space, but no confidence or ability to truly achieve such a perfect.
He was restrained, he did not take Henry Fonda design into absolute hero, he is just a lot of sanity, the testimony of witnesses of the confusion is gradually put forward by other jurors, everyone to put forward their own personal experience and observation questions, such as poor background, people questioned the holding spring knife method, the old man questioned the witness of vision. Throughout the discussion, a juror number is outside the role of internal organizer, Fonda organizer, only this.
He was restrained, even his warmth. At the end of the jurors out of court, the rain has stopped, summer evening and the sky, as the first man to supporters Fonda, two people for each name, then separated from.
He was restrained, he did not go to revisit the superfluous case is non truth, that has nothing to do with the story of the core, the core of the story is just a boy of guilty or not guilty.
A building is successful, the development of drama is successful, but the control in restraint extremely in the home.
Study and drama director, "Twelve Angry Men" is absolutely worth repeatedly fine works.
Once again, he to me movie ideas and life beliefs are deeply influenced, but the master.
I love this summer, you can see a good movie, you can write, you can look at their own rational and restrained.
