染雾英语辩论赛主席稿 篇一
Ladies and gentlemen, honorable judges, esteemed opponents, and fellow participants, it is my utmost pleasure to welcome you all to this prestigious English debate competition. Today, we gather here to witness the power of words, the art of persuasion, and the exchange of ideas.
In this debate, we will delve into a topic that has been a subject of great controversy and debate – "Should the use of smartphones be allowed in schools?" This is a topic that affects us all, as technology plays an increasingly significant role in our lives. The use of smartphones in schools has sparked heated discussions and divided opinions. Today, we have the opportunity to explore both sides of the argument and gain a deeper understanding of the issue.
On one hand, proponents argue that smartphones can enhance learning experiences. With access to the internet at their fingertips, students can easily search for information, conduct research, and expand their knowledge beyond what is offered in textbooks. Moreover, smartphones can facilitate communication and collaboration among students, enabling them to work on group projects more efficiently. They also argue that banning smartphones in schools would be impractical, as it is virtually impossible to enforce such a ban in the digital age we live in.
On the other hand, opponents believe that allowing smartphones in schools can be detrimental to students' academic performance and overall well-being. They argue that smartphones can be a major distraction, with students spending more time on social media and gaming rather than focusing on their studies. Furthermore, the inappropriate use of smartphones, such as cyberbullying or cheating, can have serious consequences for students' mental health and educational integrity.
As the debate unfolds, I urge all participants to engage in a respectful and constructive manner. Let us remember that the goal of this debate is not only to win the argument but also to broaden our perspectives and deepen our understanding of the issue at hand. Let us listen attentively, weigh the arguments, and critically analyze the evidence presented. It is through this process that we can truly appreciate the power of debate and its ability to shape our thoughts and opinions.
In conclusion, I wish all the participants the best of luck in this debate. May the exchange of ideas and the clash of arguments ignite our intellectual curiosity and inspire us to become better advocates for the causes we believe in. Let us embrace the spirit of healthy competition and engage in a debate that will challenge our preconceptions and broaden our horizons. Thank you.
英语辩论赛主席稿 篇二
Ladies and gentlemen, honorable judges, esteemed opponents, and fellow participants, it is an honor to stand before you today as we explore yet another thought-provoking topic in this English debate competition. The power of debate lies in its ability to shed light on controversial issues and stimulate critical thinking. Today, we gather here to discuss the topic "Should the voting age be lowered to 16?" – a topic that has ignited passionate debates around the world.
On one side of the argument, proponents advocate for lowering the voting age to 16, arguing that 16-year-olds possess the necessary maturity and awareness to make informed decisions. They argue that 16-year-olds are affected by political decisions that shape their future, such as education policies and environmental regulations. Therefore, they argue, it is only fair to grant them the right to have a say in these matters. Additionally, proponents contend that lowering the voting age would encourage civic engagement and instill a sense of responsibility and participation in young individuals.
On the other side of the argument, opponents believe that the voting age should not be lowered to 16. They argue that 16-year-olds lack the life experience and knowledge required to make well-informed decisions. Supporters of maintaining the current voting age also contend that adolescence is a period of emotional and intellectual development, and it is important to allow individuals to mature further before granting them the right to vote. Furthermore, opponents argue that lowering the voting age may lead to increased manipulation of young voters by political parties and undermine the integrity of the electoral system.
As we embark on this debate, I urge all participants to approach the discussion with an open mind and a willingness to challenge our own beliefs. Let us remember that the purpose of this debate is not only to convince others of our viewpoint but also to learn from one another and gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding this issue.
In conclusion, I wish all the participants the best of luck in this debate. May this competition serve as a platform for intellectual growth and the exchange of ideas. Let us engage in a spirited debate that fosters respect, understanding, and empathy. Thank you.
英语辩论赛主席稿 篇三
英语辩论赛主席稿
以下是辩论赛主席稿!由YJBYS小编为大家提供，供大家参考借鉴，
英语辩论赛主席稿
。Good afternoon boys and girls， ladies and gentlemen， welcome to the English Speech contest of ****************************. Firstly， let’s introduce today's honorable leader and guests: the only leader and judge ，our teacher ***********and all the schoolmates of class two ， welcome!!! Now please welcome Ms ******* to give us a speech..
Thank you， Ms *******
This class will be our stage to show our strong ability in debating and I'm your chief judge.
I think you all have known the topic today" Should different cultures Merge into each other or maintain their unique factures?"
比赛要求##########
First，let`s introduce the two teams : Sit on my right hand side is the positive side， They hold the opinion different cultures should Merge into each other. Welcome!! ###正方发言 ### thank you for the Wonderful opening of positive side.
Sit on my left hand side is the negative side， They hold the opinion different cultures should matain their unique factures. Welcome~!!! ###反方发言### thank you for the Wonderful opening of negative side.
As everybody is ready now， here starts the debate. Let us listen to both sides of the opponent
Then， entered the first stage， let's listen to the debater one of positive is how the first. Time for three minutes. Timing begins.###
Thank you for the wonderful speech. now let’s listen to the debater one of negative’s speech. time is also three minutes. Timing begins!######
You can see the specification in speech， both the opponent is assurance. Next we will enter the test inpidual should debate the ability of attack of the argument. Please debater two of positive side select debater two or three of negative side to the questions. ##Time is one and half minutes. Timing begins!#########.
Time is up! Please debater three of positive side select debater two or three of negative side to the questions. ##Time is one and half minutes. Timing begins!#########.
Time is up!! Now Please debater two of negative side select debater two or three of positive side to the questions. Time is one and half minutes. the timer starts.#########
Time is up! Now Please debater three of negative side select debater two or three of positive side to the questions. Time is one and half minutes. the timer starts.#########
Time is up! Thank you， after just both a debate， next is their talent， is also the time for the most wonderful moments -- debate free debate. Well， now I declare the official start of free debate， please speak first square， time began.
Well， everyone audience， just this free debate has been very exciting， but both contestants on the fourth summary statement to be done， often more important. We start with four anti-party debate， and the time is 2 minutes， time began.
Thank you， we now please do contend for four square square summarizing statements， time is 2 minutes， timer starts.
Below I announced a game best debator is: * * *. The team won the game is: * * * * * *.
Up to now， the game has all over.
Once again thank guests as coming， thank you for your attention and support! Thank you!
